Supreme Court · 1991 INSC 245 · Decided 20 September 1991
Byram Pestonfl Gariwala v. Union Bank of India and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1991 INSC 245 · [1991] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 187
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3698/1991
- Decided
- 20 September 1991
- Bench
- T.K. THOMMEN, R.M. SAHAI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC
Headnote
B Code of Civil Procedure, 1908--0rder XXlll, Rule 3-Compromise -counsel's rol~ and Post 1976 CPC Amendment-Object of amend- ment-Legislative intention indicated. Code of Civil Procedure,1908-0rder XX/II read with Order XX/, Rule c 22--Compromise entered into by the Counsel of defendant in High. to defendant made absolute on 23.1.199o-Questioning the com- promise after six years by chamber summon-- Effect of. Before this Court, the appellant-defendant challenged the judgment D _of the High Court which held that the decree made against the defendant ~ in terms of a compromise in writing
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)