Supreme Court · 2016 INSC 546 · Decided 22 July 2016
Bunga Daniel Babu v. Mis Sri Vasudeva Constructions & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2016 INSC 546 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 293
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 944/2016
- Decided
- 22 July 2016
- Bench
- DIPAK MISRA, N.V. RAMANA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Consumer Protection Act Section 2(l)(d)
Headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986: s.2(l)(d) - Consumer - Agreement between the. appellant-land-owner and the builder­ re5pondent no. I - Builder required to construct and complete the building within a stipulated time - Apartments constructed were to be shared in the proportion of 40% and 60% and in case of non-completion within stipulated time to pay rent to the appellant - Terms of the agreement did not show that it was a joint venture agreement - Appellant was neither partner nor co-adventurer nor participated in the construction business - Since appellant is only entitled to a
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)