Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 646 · Decided 8 May 1996

Biswa RAN.JAN Sahoo and ORS. v. Sushanta Kumar Dlnda and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1996 INSC 646 · [1996] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 570
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 9157/1996
Decided
8 May 1996
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B. PATTANAIK (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 14, 16

Headnote

SAHOO AND ORS. v. SUSHANTA KUMAR DlNDA AND ORS. MAY 8, 1996 B [K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.j Se1vice Law: Selection proces;~Lack of intewity and si11wity in-Ruilway.1~Setec- C tion for Chargemen 'B' Grade i11 Mechanical and Elect1ical Division-Mass 111al-practice in to persons tt-•ho are said lo have been selected and given a11pointn1ent-Procedure adopted in selection process is i11 flagrant breach of the 1U!es offending Articles 14 and D 16 of the Constitution. Constitution of India, 1950 : Articles 14 and 16. Selection for charge111en 'B' Grade in

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)