Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 1318 · Decided 17 December 2009

Bhuwalka Steel INDUS. LTD. v. Bombay Iron & Steel Labour BO. & ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 1318 · [2009] 16 S.C.R. 618
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 8452/2009
Decided
17 December 2009
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE, V.S. SIRPURKAR (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 254

Headnote

Labour laws: t &bull; c Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Worl<ers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - ss. 2(11 }, (12), 21 and 22 - Term 'unprotected worker' - Interpretation of - Scope of s. 2(11) - Held: Language of s. 2(11) is plain, unambiguous capable of D any other meaning - It means that every worl<er, who is doing manual work and is engaged or to be engaged in any ~ . scheduled employment, would become an 'unprotected worl<er' - In the Preamble of the Act, 'unprotected manual worl<ers' is mentioned in wider sense - It

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)