Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 385 · Decided 8 September 1999
Balraj Taneja and ANR. v. Sunil Madan and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1999 INSC 385 · [1999] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 258
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4968/1999
- Decided
- 8 September 1999
- Bench
- S. SAGHIR AHMAD, D.P. MOHAPATRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 8, 2(9); Constitution; Specific Relief Act
Headnote
TA NEJA AND ANR. v. SUNIL MADAN AND ANR. SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 B [S. SAGHIR AHMAD AND D.P. MOHAPATRA JJ.] Civil Procedure Code, Order 8 Rules 5 and JO-Suit-No Written Statement filed-Facts in plaint not controverted-Still Court has to satisfy itself that there is no fact requiring further proof, in his part of contract, a Decree of Specific Performance could not be passed. CPC, S 2 (9)- "Judgment" delivered in a case should contain, apart D from facts of the case and points for determination, the process of reasoning which led to the decision irrespective of whether the case is
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)