Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 40 · Decided 4 February 1999
Baldev Singh Dhingra and Others v. Madan Lal Gupta and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1999 INSC 40 · [1999] 1 S.C.R. 377
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2478/1989
- Decided
- 4 February 1999
- Bench
- S.B. MAJMUDAR, R.P. SETHI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
B r Advocates Act, 1961 : Sections 2(1)(a), 2(1)(k), 2(1)(n), 6, 17, 26A 3~Disciplinary Proceed- ings under section 35 against practising Advocate-Charge of misconduct c while acting as a Judge-Licence to practice su"endered-Name on the roll of the State Bar Council-Advocate not practising at Dis- ciplinary jurisdiction under section 35 cannot be invoked for misconduct allegedly committed by a non-practising Advocate. -..... D S.35---Disciplinary proceedings-Invocation of-WJ1ert-fleld, S. 35 can be invoked against a practising Advocate for professional or any other mis-
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)