Supreme Court · 1953 INSC 90 · Decided 18 December 1953
Baburao Shantaram More v. The Bombay Housing Board and ANOTHER.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1953 INSC 90 · [1954] 1 S.C.R. 572
- Case number
- SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 271/1952
- Decided
- 18 December 1953
- Bench
- M. PATANJALI SASTRI, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, VIVIAN BOSE, GHULAM HASAN, B. JAGANNADHADAS (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 14, 32; Rent Control Act
Headnote
1¥ aryam Singh and Another ,. Amarnalh and Another. 1953 bee. 18. 572 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1954J quite properly in doing so. In our opinion there is no ground on which in an appeal by special leave under article 136 we should interfere. The appeal, therefore, must stand dismissed with C. J., s. R. DAS, VIVIAN BosE, GHULAM HASAN and JAGANNADHADAS JT.J Constitution of India, art. 14-Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodg­ ing House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Act LVII of 1947), s. 4- Bombay Housing Board (Amendment) Act (Bombay Act XI of 1951) inserting new s. 3-A in Bombay Housing
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)