Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 590 · Decided 31 October 2003
Babu Lal and ORS. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2003 INSC 590 · [2003] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 54
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 532/2003
- Decided
- 31 October 2003
- Bench
- DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 147, 148, 149, 302; Evidence Act Section 32
Headnote
Practice and procedure-Judgment by appellate courts-Held, elaborate and detailed analysis not required but only sufficient reasons for concurrence C are required in concurring judgment whereas elaborate and detailed analysis and reasoned conclusions are imperative in a judgement of reversal. cannot wipe out credibility of evidence-If evidence found credible after careful analysis, it can form basis of conviction-On the facts, held, evidence of eye-witnesses credible-Penal Code, 1860-Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302. Evidence Act, 1872-Section 32-Dying declaration-Injured
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)