Supreme Court · 2008 INSC 1124 · Decided 3 October 2008

Babloo Pasi v. State of Jharkhand & ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2008 INSC 1124 · [2008] 14 S.C.R. 161
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1572/2008
Decided
3 October 2008
Bench
C.K. THAKKER, D.K. JAIN (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 3048, 306; CrPC Section 401(2); Evidence Act Section 35; Juvenile Justice Act Section 53

Headnote

·Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000; Ss. 49, 53 and 54: A B S.53 rlw S.54 - Revisional Jurisdiction - Exercise of- C Held: High Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, can not pass an order prejudicial to any person without affording him a reasonable as party respondent and prejudiced by the impugned order passed by the High Court declaring the ac- · D cused Juvenile - Hence, High Court erred in reversing the order passed by the Board without affording him an opportu- · nity of being heard - 'Audi alteram partem' -

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)