Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 918 · Decided 21 August 1996
Baba Peer Paras Nath and ANR. ETC. v. State of Haryana
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 918 · [1996] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 51
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 297/1996
- Decided
- 21 August 1996
- Bench
- G.N. RAY, B.L. HANSARIA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 307, 341109, 109, 34; Evidence Act
Headnote
NATH AND ANR. ETC. v. STATE OF HARYANA AUGUST 21, 1996 [G.N. RAY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.) Indian Penal Code, 1860 : Sections 307 and 341109. Ten-orist and Dismptive (Prevention) Activities Act, 1987 : Sections 3(3) and 15. A B c Criminal Trial-Accused persons-Confession made by ac­ on confessional state- D ments made by other accused who were charged under TADA offences convicted the appellants-Held the confessional statement recorded under Section 15 of the TADA is admissible against the co-accused or abettor or conspirator provided an acwsed is Uied with other co-accused
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)