Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 265 · Decided 6 May 2005

B Leelavathi v. Honnamma and ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2005 INSC 265 · [2005] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 146
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 7034/2003
Decided
6 May 2005
Bench
ASHOK BHAN, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil

Headnote

THI v. HONNAMMA 147 . suit on the similar line. The suit was dismissed by the trial court holding A that by virtue of s.9 of the Act respondent No. 1 could not challenge the sale deed executed by the BDA and the suit was not maintainable for non- '• issuance of notice by plaintiff to BDA deed in favour of the appellant, the sale was bad in law and that the plaintiff had perfected her title by way of adverse possession. Aggrieved, the transferee filed the present appeal. ': Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Plea of non-issuance of show cause notice by the BOA c before

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)