Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 391 · Decided 30 August 2005
Atma Ram v. Shakuntala Rani
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 391 · [2005] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 1071
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 6742/2003
- Decided
- 30 August 2005
- Bench
- B.P. SINGH, ARUN KUMAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 227; Rent Control Act Section 27, 14(J)(a)
Headnote
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956, Sections 27 and 14(J)(a)-Refasal of landlord to accept rent-Proper remedy available with tenant-Held: Tenant A B can deposit same in the Court of Rent Controller u/s. 27-Deposit made somewhere else shall not be treated as a valid payment/tender of arrears of C rent Held : If a specific procedure is provided under the provision, deviation therefrom is not permissible. Constitution of India, 1950-Artic/e 227--Consurrentfinding a/Courts below-Revisionaljurisdiction-Exercise of-Scope-Held: I/there is serious error of law committed by courts below, then High
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)