Supreme Court · 1995 INSC 423 · Decided 26 July 1995
Aspinwal and CO., Kulshekar, Mangalore v. Laitha Padugady and ORS. ETC. ETC.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1995 INSC 423 · [1995] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 369
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4086/1986
- Decided
- 26 July 1995
- Bench
- M.M. PUNCHHI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Industrial Disputes Act
Headnote
AL AND CO., KULSHEKAR, MAN GALORE A v. LAITHA PADUGADY AND ORS. ETC. ETC. JULY 26, 1995 (M.M. PUNCHHI AND MRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, JJ.J B Gratuity Act, 1972: Sections 2(b)(c)-Explanation-Section 4(As it stood prior to 1984)-lnterpretation of. C Gratuity-Computation or-seasonal industry-Closure from season and not for two seasons in each calender year. D General Clauses Act, 1897: Concept of 'year' under Section 3(66)-Held inapplicable to the concept of 'completed year of service' under Gratuity Act, 1972. Words and Phrases: Expression 'completed year of service'-Occurring in Section 4
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)