Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 539 · Decided 30 October 2001
Antonysami v. Arulanandam Pillai (D) BY LRS. and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 539 · [2001] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 534
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 14559/1996
- Decided
- 30 October 2001
- Bench
- D.P. MOHAPATRA, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC; Limitation Act Section 136
Headnote
Limitation Act, 1963-Article 136-Execution o.f decree-Limitation period-Specified date mentioned in decree to carry out directions, whereafter execution could be applied-Compliance direction after the specified date­ C Execution petition filed within limitation period .from the date the Procedure Code, 1908, Order XXl. ·o Limitation-Period of-Detennination of~Held, is to be guided by strict grammatical meaning of the words and not on equitable consideration. A suit for specific performance of contract of sale by predecessor in interest of the decree
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)