Supreme Court · 1988 INSC 307 · Decided 29 September 1988
An Advocate v. B.B. Haradara & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1988 INSC 307 · [1988] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 361
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 316/1987
- Decided
- 29 September 1988
- Bench
- M.P. THAKKAR, B.C. RAY (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Advocate's Act-Sec. 38-Professional misconduct standard of proof-Required of-Section 35-Procedure to be followed at the inquiry by Bar Council. The appellant is an Advocate. Gautam Chand was one of his old · clients. The_ com_plainant-Re_sp_ondent No. _l engag~d_ the ~P.pellant on. - 'being for recovery of a sum of Rs.30,098_with Court costs and interest in the Court of City Civil Judge at Bangalore. The appellant passed on the papers to his junior advocate to file the Suit which he did. The complainant's allegation is that the matter in dispute in the suit had not been
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)