Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 939 · Decided 21 July 2009
Amrit Lal and ORS. v. Maharani and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 939 · [2009] 11 S.C.R. 617
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4585/2009
- Decided
- 21 July 2009
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, DEEPAK VERMA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Hindu Succession Act; Rent Control Act; Succession Act
Headnote
\ Hindu Succession Act, 1956/0udh Rent Act, 1886: Mitakshara coparcenary property - One party claiming c to the exclusion of others, on the basis of patta, allegedly granted by Zamindar - Held: Property enured to the benefit of joint family - 1t was for the claimant to establish that the joint patta but there was no pl~ading far less any proof in that regard - If for D purpose of collection of revenue or otherwise, name of one of them was entered into in the revenue records, the same would not mean that the property vested in him irrespective of the share of the other co-owners -
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)