Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 202 · Decided 13 April 2005
Amit Kumar Shaw and ANR. v. Farida Khatoon and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 202 · [2005] 3 S.C.R. 509
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2592/2005
- Decided
- 13 April 2005
- Bench
- ASHOK BHAN, AR. LAKSHMANAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 52; Transfer of Property Act Section 52
Headnote
B . . Code of Civil Procedure, I 908-0rder I Rule I 0, Order 22 Rule I 0- Necessary party-Subsequent transferee-Substitution of-During pendency of the second appeal, suit property purchased by appellants-Appel/ants' c application for substitution of their names in the appeal dismissed by the High since appellants were the only persons having subsisting right, title and interest in the property and were absolutely necessary in order to decide the appeal on merits-Transfer of property Act, 1882- Section 52. D Doctrines : Doctrine of /is pendens-Explained The question which arose
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)