Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 445 · Decided 1 April 2009

Ahmmadsahab Abdul Mulla (Dead) BY Proposed LRS. v. Bibijan and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 445 · [2009] 5 S.C.R. 476
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 4190/2000
Decided
1 April 2009
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT, H.S. BEDI, A.K. GANGULY (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Reference answered
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Limitation Act

Headnote

c UM/TA TION ACT, 1963: Schedule - Article 54 - Word 'date' occurring in the expression 'date fixed for the performance' - HELD: Is • suggestive of a specified date in the calendar. . D In the instant appeal the question referred to three- Judge Bench the expression "date" used in Article 54 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 is suggestive of a specific date in the calendar. E Answering the reference, the Court HELD: On analyzing the expressions 'date' and 'fixed', the inevitable conclusion is that the expression I, - F

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)