Supreme Court · 1997 INSC 388 · Decided 8 April 1997
Achutananda Baidya v. Prafullya Kumar Gayen and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1997 INSC 388 · [1997] 3 S.C.R. 709
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1009/1987
- Decided
- 8 April 1997
- Bench
- G.N. RAY, S.C. SEN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act Section 60; Constitution Article 227
Headnote
v. PRAFULL YA KUMAR GA YEN AND ORS. APRIL 8, 1997 [G.N. RAY AND S.C. SEN, J.J.) B Co11stitutio11 of India, 1950 : Arlicle 227. Jwisdiction of High Cowt-Nature and scope of-Appellate CJwt found that there was 110 oral agreement for recon veyance of alienated C land-High Coult inteifered with order as administrative supe1intendence-High Co wt could inte1f ere with finding of f<•ct anived at by the subordinate cowt if i1 was not based on any evidence or upon manifest misreading of evidence-ln .he circumstances of the case, D High Cowt was justified in inte1fering with the order of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)