Supreme Court · 2012 INSC 53 · Decided 27 January 2012
A.V. Padma & ORS. v. R. Venugopal & Ors
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2012 INSC 53 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 437
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1095/2012
- Decided
- 27 January 2012
- Bench
- CYRIAC JOSEPH, T.S. THAKUR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Motor Vehicles Act
Headnote
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988: A B Compensation - Disbursement of - Case of Susamma c Thomas, explained - Held: Sufficient discretion has been given to the Tribunal not to insist on investment of the compensation amount in long term fixed deposit and to release even the whole amount in the case of be understood to mean that the 0 Tribunals were to take a rigid stand while considering an application seeking release of the money - The guidelines cast a responsibility on the Tribunals to pass appropriate orders after examining each case on its own merits - The prayer in the application of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)