Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 355 · Decided 10 August 2001
A.C. Arulappan . v. SMT. Ahalya Naik
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 355 · [2001] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 425
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5233/2001
- Decided
- 10 August 2001
- Bench
- S. RAJENDRA BABU, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Specific Relief Act Section 20
Headnote
B Specific Relief Act, 1963-Section 20-Agreement for sale of property between the parties-Sale deed not executed-Another agreement for sale entered into stipulating the time limit for execution-Suit for specific relief­ Held, Court jurisdiction to decree specific relief is discretionary and advantage over the appellant-Not entitled to a decree of specific performance. Appellant entered into an agreement with respondent to sell suit- D property for certain consideration in May 1977. Respondent paid a sum of Rs. 42,000 as advance. No time limit was stipulated for execution of sale
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)