Landmark Judgment

Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co.: How Section 56 Handles Frustration of Contract

Nyaya Prep • Published • 3 min read

Nyaya Prep banner for Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur and the doctrine of frustration
Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. places frustration of contract under Section 56. · Generated for Nyaya Prep

In Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. and Another (1953), the Supreme Court held that frustration of contract lives inside Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, not in English case law. This post covers the facts, the three questions, the land contract point, why the contract survived and how to use the case in judiciary exam answers. Useful for the Civil Judge Exam and PCS J Exam.

  • Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur
  • Doctrine of Frustration
  • Section 56 Indian Contract Act
  • Civil Judge Exam
  • PCS J Exam
  • APO Exam
  • Case Law

More blogs